Intimacy

A cost ledger for loneliness, the phone, and the people you work with

Published 2026-02-16 · 7 min read · By LovePinnacle Editorial

Quick answer

Coworkers are inside the map of social connection. One line in a 2023 advisory prices stress-linked missed work at 154 billion dollars a year, and another ties a phone during face-to-face time with people you care about to less enjoyment.

The 2023 Surgeon General's advisory, titled Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation, counts colleagues inside social connection, in the same breath as family, friends, and neighbors, and it treats workplaces as one of the settings that shape that connection.

This page is a cost ledger. It is not a friendship essay, and it is not a guide to bonding across departments. Each line is something the advisory lets me put in a column, plus a note on what the line does not buy you. I will keep the columns separate so a dollar figure does not get mixed up with a phone habit, and a phone habit does not get mixed up with a definition.

Line one is definition, and the price on it is zero. In the advisory, social connection means three things at once: how your ties are arranged, what those ties actually do, and how good they are. Colleagues count. So do neighbors. Schools, neighborhoods, digital environments, and workplaces inform connection. If your mental model says connection happens only at home, the ledger's first line corrects the model before any money appears. A Tuesday standup is not automatically care. It is inside the map. That matters because costs later in the file are costs of thin connection, and work is one place connection can be thin even when a calendar is full.

Line two is the absenteeism figure. The advisory attributes 154 billion dollars a year, in the United States, in stress-related absenteeism, to loneliness. Read the verb. Attributes. What you can say, without stretching, is that the nation's top public-health office has tied a very large absenteeism cost to loneliness. What you cannot say is that your own sick day last March is a line item in that 154 billion. A national attribution is not a personal invoice. It is a reason an employer, and a coworker, should stop treating isolation as a private mood with no bill attached.

Put a second dollar line beside it so the two are not fused. Social isolation among older adults is estimated in the same advisory at 6.7 billion dollars a year in excess Medicare spending. That is not the absenteeism number. It is not a workplace payroll number. It is a health-coverage number for older adults. If someone in a meeting quotes "billions from loneliness" without saying which billions, ask them which line they mean. Mixing 154 billion in stress-related absenteeism with 6.7 billion in Medicare spending makes both figures less usable. The ledger only works if the labels stay on the jars.

Line three is the phone. When people often looked at a phone while they were physically with family or with friends, the advisory says distraction rose, the conversation got poorer, and they rated the time as less enjoyable. The people in that finding are family and friends, not a sample described here as "office mates." I am not going to quietly swap the nouns. The workplace link is adjacent, and it should stay labeled as adjacent. Colleagues are part of social connection on line one. The phone finding is about in-person talk with people you are close to. A work friendship can be that kind of talk. A status meeting is not automatically that kind of talk. Here is an illustrative example, not a scene from the advisory. Noor puts the phone face up beside a colleague she actually likes, during a twenty-minute debrief that is not on the agenda. She answers one glance, then another. The advisory's finding says distraction goes up, quality goes down, and enjoyment, as people report it, goes down. Noor's debrief is a place you can test the finding in a workday. It is not proof the study was conducted in her building.

Among the personal steps the advisory lists, one is blunt: cut down distraction, and leave the phone untouched while you eat and while a conversation matters. That suggestion is a behavior, not a new dollar. On a ledger it sits under line three as the action that protects the enjoyment the finding says you lose. Face down, in a bag, in another room. The point is not purity. The point is that the quality loss is described as a consequence of frequent use during the conversation, so the frequency is the lever you can actually move.

There are prevalence lines that explain why the bill can hide. Even before the pandemic, roughly half of U.S. adults said they felt lonely. Among people who feel lonely or cut off often, or all the time, fewer than one in five treat that feeling as a serious problem. A cost that half of adults brush against, and that most of the lonely do not flag as major, will not show up as a clean complaint in a staff survey. Absenteeism can rise while everyone says the issue is "just stress." The advisory's attribution says loneliness is in that stress bill. Recognition is low. That is its own line: an undercount of the problem, sitting next to an overcount of how fine everyone claims to be.

Health costs belong on the ledger and still are not the same jar as the 154 billion. Loneliness, the advisory says, travels with higher odds of heart trouble, dementia, stroke, depressed mood, anxiety, and dying sooner. Going without social ties can lift the chance of an early death to a level the advisory compares with smoking as many as fifteen cigarettes daily, and above the added risk it ties to obesity and to sitting out exercise. The early-death increase is twenty-six percent with loneliness and twenty-nine percent with social isolation. Sixteen long-running studies, pooled, tied weak social ties to a twenty-nine percent rise in heart-disease risk and a thirty-two percent rise in stroke risk. I am stacking these as health lines, not as workplace lines. They explain why a connection problem is allowed to sit in a public-health document next to an absenteeism figure. They do not calculate your team's sick leave. A 2022 line from the American Heart Association, included in the advisory, calls isolation and loneliness ordinary, and too often missed, as influences on heart health and on brain health. "Too often missed" matches the line about fewer than one in five. "Ordinary" matches the line about roughly half of adults. The dollar line is what happens when those facts hit a payroll.

Technology is not a single-signed column. The same file also says tools can keep people connected, and it names disabled people and people hunting for a community as examples. Online groups, it says, can pass along facts, suggestions, and comfort. A ledger that only scolds the phone is misreading the file. The loss shows up with frequent use during in-person time. The gain shows up when the tool is how someone reaches a community they cannot reach by walking down a hall. You can keep both lines without averaging them into a shrug. Turn the screen over while someone is sitting with you. Open when the person is far and the screen is the room they have.

What I am leaving off this ledger, on purpose, is any minute-count of friend time and any essay about how to feel close to a teammate. Those are different jobs. The job here is to see costs that are already printed: a definition that includes colleagues, an absenteeism attribution of 154 billion dollars, a separate Medicare figure for older adults, a phone finding about enjoyment and quality, a low rate of recognizing loneliness as a major problem, and a set of health risks the advisory places beside them. If a manager wants a program, the program has to pick a line. Reducing phone use in the conversations that actually matter is a line with a behavior attached. Cutting loneliness-related absenteeism is a line with a national price tag and no recipe in these notes for your building. Do not let the price tag pretend to be a recipe.

If you want the distinction between being alone and being lonely, unpacked without this ledger's columns, being alone and being lonely is a different cut of the public concern. It will not replace the figures above.

Before you adopt a number from a slide, match it to one line on this page. If the slide says billions, ask whether it means absenteeism or Medicare. If the slide says phones ruin work, ask whether it has quietly changed "family and friends" into "every meeting." The advisory is careful. A slide often is not. Your copy of the ledger can be a note in a drawer: colleagues count as connection, loneliness is tied to a huge absenteeism cost, and a phone during a real conversation is tied to less enjoyment. Three lines, labeled, are more honest than one blended slogan.

Put the dollar figure back in its jar, and for one conversation today decide whether the phone stays face down until you are done.

Figures and the advisory file

Frequently Asked Questions

Do people at work count as connection?
Yes. Coworkers are listed with kin, friends, and neighbors, and workplaces are named as settings that shape ties.
What does the big absenteeism number mean for my office?
It is a national yearly attribution of stress-linked missed work to loneliness: 154 billion. It does not bill one absence, and it is not the Medicare jar.
Was the phone finding an office study?
The people named are family and friends, together in person. A colleague debrief on this page is marked as an illustrative example, not as their sample.
Are screens only a cost?
No. The file also says tools can keep someone in touch, including disabled people and people looking for a community, and that online groups can pass along support.
Which billions are which?
Absenteeism is the 154 billion. Excess Medicare spending among older adults is the separate 6.7 billion. Ask a slide which jar it means.

platonic · depths · intimacy · romance

← All articles