How anger and sadness move through Gross's process model

Published 2025-08-04 · 6 min read · By LovePinnacle Editorial

Here is an illustrative example: after dinner, Maren and Ellis sit in a parked car, Maren angry that a call was forgotten and sad that the evening collapsed, Ellis angry at being accused in the dark. The scene is a teaching sketch with those two names. It was not recorded in a lab. Only anger and sadness are in play. Other feelings can wait. The tool for reading them is James J. Gross's process model, the 1998 account also given with Thompson in the Handbook of Emotion Regulation: five families in time order, from the situation you take part in to the response you show. Emotion generation does not finish when you react. What you do feeds back and becomes part of the next situation.

Treat the anger and the sadness as information inside that order. They are not noise you are required to delete. They tell you something about the moment, and each family is a place you can meet that information. Sheppes, Suri, and Gross, in their 2015 review, extend this model. In that extended account, expressive suppression remains a response-modulation tactic. Reappraisal is not that tactic. Reappraisal sits earlier, under cognitive change. If you blur those two, you will think a quiet face and a changed meaning are one skill.

Where the evening could still have been chosen

Situation selection is the earliest family. It is antecedent-focused, which means it acts before the response is fully going. Applied to this sketch, selection is the decision to have the hard talk in a parked car after dinner rather than at a table earlier, or rather than not tonight. Anger about a forgotten call has a situation it grew in. Sadness about a ruined evening has one too. Choosing a different setting, or a different time, does not make the forgotten call fair or unfair. It changes the situation in which the two feelings arrive. You might be thinking the feelings are only about character. In the model, the situation is part of how they are generated. A different seat in the evening is a real lever, and it is the first one.

Changing the car, then changing what you stare at

Situation modification comes next. They are already in the car. Modification means altering that setup: lights on, a plan to step outside, an agreement to talk about the call for ten minutes and then stop. The anger and the sadness are still information about a missed call and a spoiled night. The edited setup gives that information a different container. It is not yet a new opinion about whose fault the call was.

Attentional deployment is the family that chooses the spotlight. Maren can lock attention on the forgotten call until anger is the only information in the car, or she can also notice the sadness, which is about the evening and not only about the blame. Ellis can lock onto the accusation, or notice that the sadness is in the car too. Attention does not settle who should have phoned. It decides which piece of information gets rehearsed. Gross places this before the meaning is rewritten. You can aim your attention and still be furious. Those are not opposites in the model.

A new meaning is not a blank face

Cognitive change includes reappraisal. Reappraisal takes the information and offers it a different meaning. "You forgot me" can be revisited as "the call slipped and the night still matters to both of us," or as "this has happened enough that the slip itself is the problem." One of those may fit and the other may be a comfort you do not believe. The model does not bless every new story. It locates the move: you are changing the appraisal, and you are doing it earlier than the face you wear. Anger's information (something was crossed) and sadness's information (something was lost) can take new appraisals without being talked out of existence. A truer appraisal might make the anger clearer, not smaller. That still counts as cognitive change.

Response modulation comes last, and it is the response-focused family. Expressive suppression lives here. The anger is already up. The sadness is already up. Suppression pushes on the expression: a flat voice, a joke, a "forget it" that hides both feelings. Sheppes, Suri, and Gross do not treat that push as reappraisal. Reappraisal changed meaning. Suppression changes the visible response after the feeling is underway. They can even point in opposite directions. You might reappraise the missed call as a real loss and then say so, which is not suppression. You might keep the harshest meaning and only hide the face, which is not reappraisal. Doing the second one and calling it the first one is how couples end up confused about what just happened.

The reply becomes the next situation

Because the response feeds back into the situation, a suppressed "forget it" is not a private ending. It is the situation Ellis or Maren now has to answer. A face that hides sadness gives the other person no information about the loss, so the next minute is built out of anger alone, or out of silence. A sentence that names both the anger and the sadness modifies what comes next. Gross's loop says the generation process stays open. You do not get to modulate the response and leave the world unchanged. The other person is part of the situation your response just wrote.

In the sketch, imagine Maren swallows the sadness and only shows the anger. Ellis meets accusation without the news that the night itself was the loss. His anger, already about being accused in the dark, now has a narrower situation to answer. Imagine instead that the meaning shifts, for one of them, from "you ruined this" to "the call mattered because the evening mattered," and that meaning is said out loud. The next situation contains different information. Neither version is a research result. Both are the feedback idea applied to a labeled example, so you can see why a quiet face and a changed meaning do not set up the same next minute.

This will not teach you to stop fighting. These notes give no percent by which any tactic improves a couple. They do not say suppression is always wrong or that reappraisal is always right. They say the two tactics sit in different families, and that anger and sadness can be met earlier than the face. If either feeling in your relationship is more than you can handle safely, talk with a licensed therapist about your actual life. The parked car is not your chart. The five families, in a different scene and without this fight, are also sketched in five places an emotion can be steered.

In your last hard conversation, did you change the meaning of the moment, or did you only change your face?

Model and review cited here

• Gross, J. J. (1998), and Gross and Thompson, "Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations," in Gross (Ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation.
• Sheppes, Suri, and Gross (2015), Annual Review of Clinical Psychology.

depths · managing · negative · emotions

← All articles